|

Much has been said about the benefits of outsourcing.
So much so that outsourcing has become a knee jerk reaction of management
trying to wiggle their way out of a tight situation. Outsourcing
has also been tried out as a substitute to having an IT department.
Needless to say, such initiatives more often than not fail. A Dun
and Bradstreet's study indicates that as many as 25 percent of all
outsourcing relationships fail because the clients don't communicate
their needs clearly, costs exceed expectations, and quality of service
is poor. Outsourcing has its benefits, but a lot of meticulous planning
goes behind every successful outsourcing story.
SLAs
Service Level Agreements are contracts between the IT user &
the service provider, which details out the expected Terms of Service
& Quality of Service, which are quantifiable, measurable &
enforceable. SLAs need to have a clear language and be business
focused. Frequent technology changes may necessitate shorter agreement
periods. A good SLA defines expectations precisely. They include
both remedies and penalties for missing service levels. A clause
to update these service levels based on improved industry standards
is also important. SLAs could usually do with some outside help.
A consultant would be in a good position to provide information
on industry standards for a particular service or furnish benchmarks.
What has to be clearly communicated to the consultant is the business
critical needs that a particular software or hardware is expected
to meet. These can then be translated into technical metrics for
the SLA. The rewards & penalties give an idea to your vendor
on how critical a service is to your business. The SLAs should be
measurable and enforceable. Service levels which practically cannot
be monitored effectively are of no use.
When evaluating technology-based vendors, technical skills should
be the most important factor in the short listing process. Legal
action is a last ditch measure. The vendor selection process should
be elaborative enough to lower the probability of defaulting on
the service levels. A legal tangle may not offer an immediate solution
in the fast paced IT world, where uninterrupted service for your
IT system is vital.
Multiple vendors
Outsourcing individual business applications or services has led
to a situation where organisations have to deal with a large number
of outsourcers and applications vendors. In a report by Cutter Consortium,
out of those companies using outsourced services, 73 percent have
more than one outsourcing supplier. More & more vendors specializing
in their technology offering. This not only allows them to be technically
superior, but also gives them a cost advantage. However, a high
percentage of vendors close shop every year. IT service continuity
becomes a major issue. IT users change vendors frequently, diluting
the outsourcing advantage by over managing & disaster managing
outsourced projects.
Future of IT departments
As more & more companies derive benefit from outsourcing &
established delivery models to emulate, most corporations will eventually
rely on outsourced IT services. The role of internal IT departments
may change but they will not become extinct. Organisations will
have much smaller in-house IT departments that will have the job
of identifying, integrating and managing IT partners. Technical
knowledge will still be required to talk to consultants & IT
vendors as well as manage projects. Vendors do take greater care
when there is technical staff at the client's end. Technical architectures
& choice of technology are important decisions in IT projects.
For example, in a software project, they influence the TCO as in
deciding the development time, amount of training required, supporting
hardware & the life of the software.
Outsourcing will soon be managed as an investment portfolio whereby
cost is reduced, & risks are mitigated. The efficiency &
performance of an IT department will be measured by the benefits
that accrue out outsourcing in a timely manner.
India as an outsourcing destination
India has proved to be an effective outsourcing destination for
Fortune 500 companies. Citibank, Morgan Stanley, Wal-Mart, AT&T,
General Electric, Reebok, General Motors, Sony, Boeing, Coca-Cola,
Pepsi, SwissAir, United Airlines, Philips, General Electric, IBM,
Reebok, Lucas, British Aerospace, General Motors, and Sears are
some companies relying on software companies in India. It is estimated
that one in four global majors outsourced their mission critical
software development to India in the year 2000-2001.
It is not surprising that corporate giants in the United States,
Europe, and Japan are increasingly looking to India for cost-effective
and high-quality software solutions. A lot of independent studies
including a World Bank-funded one in the United States confirm that
vendors rated India as their number one choice for outsourcing.
The benifits of outsourcing to India is widely known today. The
tragic events of September 11 have made corporations now realize
one more advantage; that of having multiple locations for data and
applications, and having off-site IT systems, which can protect
their business when a disaster occurs.
Since 1991, Indian software exports have grown mainly based on India's
reputation of high quality and cost effectiveness. India is being
looked at for providing state-of-the-art technology and timely deliveries.
Labor accounts for more than 75 percent of the cost of developing
software, and the market for highly skilled IT professionals is
very tight in developed countries. Recruiting, hiring, and training
people to meet the constantly changing needs of the IT environment
not only costs a great deal of money but can also delay the completion
of projects. India has twice as many technical graduates as the
United States does, on an absolute basis. The result is that Indian
software developers can maintain a critical mass of qualified employees
in any specialty despite turnover rates that can be quite high.
Lately, the Government of India has taken steps to triple the output
of engineering students by the year 2008.
A comparison amongst some countries in Asia Pacific by McKinsey
based on these factors highlights the following:
|
Country
|
Workforce (a)
|
Market Access(b)
|
Local Market(c)
|
Infrastructure
(d)
|
Cosmo-politan(e)
|
Cost
Base (f)
|
Total (a+b+c+d+e-f)
|
|
India
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
11
|
|
Hong Kong
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
7
|
|
Japan
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
|
Kuala Lumpur
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
|
New Zealand
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
7
|
Ratings are on a scale of 1 to 3,
1: Denotes low 2: Denotes average 3: Denotes high
your
comments on the article
contact
the author
Share the wealth!
If you know colleagues who would be interested in this newsletter,
please direct them to http://www.webizus.com/newsletter.html
To unsubscribe from the monthly newsletter, click
on the link below to e-mail your request to us. YOU WILL RECEIVE
NO FURTHER NEWSLETTERS from Webizus Technologies if you do.
newsletter@webizus.com?subject=unsubscribe
Webizus takes your privacy seriously. To learn more
about Webizus' use of personal information, please read our Privacy
Policy at http://www.webizus.com/privacy.html
Disclaimer:
Webizus through the content published makes no warranties or guarantees
about the products/ services represented or about the articles presented
in the newsletter. The articles by various authors are entirely
their own opinion. Webizus holds no responsibility to any damage
or loss incurred in any form to any person or organization due to
the publication of any of the issues.
Copyright ©1999-2002, Webizus Technologies, All
Rights Reserved.
For more information mail us on info@webizus.com
Contact us today for a demonstration of how we can
cut down your costs and improve your business:
Email us at: info@webizus.com
or call us at +91-9821634476 / +91-22-55910132
Download
our corporate profile
|